Drawing for POWERMANAGER

USPTO serial 74525973

POWERMANAGER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OSBORNE, STANLEY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POWERMANAGER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

STEPHEN J. HOLMES

STEPHEN J HOLMES SALTER & MICHAELSON321 S MAIN STPROVIDENCE, RI 02903UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009power protection devices for use with computers and other sensitive electronic equipmentABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 22, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 5, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 23, 1999ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 23, 1999EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 5, 1998CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 18, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 5, 1997EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 5, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 21, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 17, 1995CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 19, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 17, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 2, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance