USPTO serial 74526084
FAMILY PLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JUDGE, CONNIE M.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FAMILY PLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roxanne Eades
ROXANNE EADES FELSMAN, BRADLEY, GUNTER & DILLON, LLP2600 CONTINENTAL PLZ777 MAIN STFT WORTH, TX 76102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | arranging group discounts on airfare, hotel and motel accommodations, grocery coupons, maintenance medications, prescription eyeglasses, prescription sunglasses, replacement contact lenses, mortgage acceleration, movie passes, dental services from participating dentists, prescription drugs from participating pharmacies, motor club membership, gift certificates for compact disks ("CDs") and cassettes, athletic shoes and apparel, home health and safety risk assessment, customized reports providing information related to travel, college selection and financial aid information services for two and four year colleges, and reports providing medical data information | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by UNITED SERVICE ASSOCIATION FOR HEALTHCARE
- Other trademarks owned by UNITED SERVICE ASSOCIATION FOR HEALTHCARE
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named FAMILY PLUS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 1997 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 20, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 2, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 10, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 8, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 24, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 30, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |