USPTO serial 74526327
C TEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 2, 1999
- Examiner
- FRONT, MITCHELL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with C TEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
4550 AA Sas van Gent, NL
4550 AA Sas van Gent, NL
4550 AA Sas van Gent, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard L. Kirkpatrick
CALENDAR/DOCKET DEPARTMENT PILLSBURY MADISON & SUTROP O BOX 7880SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94120-7880UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | food starches and modified food starches for use in the industrial preparation of foodstuffs | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2005 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 2, 1999 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 28, 1998 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 6, 1998 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 3, 1998 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 29, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 20, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 1998 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 24, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 1997 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 1997 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 1997 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 7, 1997 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 1997 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 1997 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 1997 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 1996 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 21, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 24, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 1, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 30, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 20, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 8, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |