USPTO serial 74526425
SHOWCAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CATALDO, PETER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SHOWCAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Prostar Interactive Mediaworks
Richmond, British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adrienne L. White
ADRIENNE L WHITE BURNS, DOANE, SWECKER & MATHISPOST OFFICE BOX 1404ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for the creation and development of other computer graphic, text, and multimedia software; pre-recorded CD-ROMs containing software programs, text, video and audio; laser video disks containing pre-recorded software programs, text video and audio; computer diskettes containing photographic images; pre-recorded computer diskettes containing software programs, text, video and audio; computer kiosks comprised of computer hardware and peripherals; electronic catalogs for combining text, data, video and audio; pre-recorded video tapes containing audio and video information concerning all of the foregoing; and instructional manuals sold with all of the foregoing | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | design and development of computer graphic, text, and multimedia presentations and electronic cataloging systems for others | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 20, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 22, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 25, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 24, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |