USPTO serial 74526931
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William David Kiesel
WILLIAM DAVID KIESEL ROY, KIESEL & TUCKERP O BOX 15928BATON ROUGE, LA 70895UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | biological culture preparations for use in biologically degrading municipal, commercial or industrial waste material | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 22, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 29, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 28, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 21, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 17, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |