USPTO serial 74527803
LA MAISON DU GOURMET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LA MAISON DU GOURMET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS V. RILEY
THOMAS V RILEY GRADY AND RILEY88 BUCKINGHAM STWATERBURY, CT 06710UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | gourmet coffees and accessories, namely light roast coffee, blend of pale and dark coffee, dark or continental roast, flavored coffees, course grind coffee, medium grind coffee, automatic drip or fine grind coffee, espresso or extra fine grind, African coffees, Indonesian coffees, American coffees, special blend coffees, decaffeinated coffees, flavored decaffeinated coffees, rare coffees, chocolate covered coffee beans, coffee makers, filters, expresso makers, French press, percolators, travel coffee makers thermal carafes, grinders, filter holders, immersion heater, kettles, tea makers, tea pots, sugar and creamers, mugs and cups, coffee tees, tea filter bag, tea filter bag holder, perma brew, tea balls, tea bag squeezer, tea strainer, lemon squeezer, tea infuser | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 12, 1995 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |