USPTO serial 74527928
KIDS COUNT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KIDS COUNT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward J. Chalfie
EDWARD J CHALFIE KECK, MAHIN & CATEP O BOX 06110CHICAGO, IL 60606-0110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | gift and party supplies made of paper, namely napkins, table cloths, paper coasters, hats, bags, invitations, gift wrap, table centerpieces, placemats, crepe paper; stationery and school supplies, namely stationery-type portfolios, theme pads, notebooks, note paper, binders, pens, pen and pencil kits, calendars, and adhesive note paper; posters, greeting cards, decals, paper heat transfers, coloring books and activity books | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 18, 1997 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 11, 1997 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 11, 1997 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 19, 1996 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 10, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 20, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 28, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |