USPTO serial 74528312
CSM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALT, JILL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CSM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Harrison
MARK HARRISON SPENCER & FRANKSTE 300 E1100 NEW YORK AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3955Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | educational and testing services in the field of software asset and licensing management, including training courses in managing software assets, training in understanding copyright law, licensing agreements, the audit process, the benefits and processes of software asset management and developing a corporate software policy | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 8, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 8, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 1995 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 15, 1995 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 6, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |