USPTO serial 74530043
HUSKIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHAW, THOMAS V
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HUSKIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Harold I. Kaplan
MICHELE P SCHWARTZ STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP180 MAIDEN LNNEW YORK, NY 10038UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | footwear for work and hiking and protective footwear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2002 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 25, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 17, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 16, 2000 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 27, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 18, 1996 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 20, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 26, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 4, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 31, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 1, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |