USPTO serial 74530353
DETECTABLE WARNING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 3, 1995
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with DETECTABLE WARNING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Hanover Architectural Products Business Trust
Hanover, PA
Other trademarks owned by Hanover Architectural Products Business Trust
Hanover Architectural Products Business Trust
Hanover, PA
Other trademarks owned by Hanover Architectural Products Business Trust
HANOVER ARCHITECTURAL PRODUCTS, INC.
Hanover, PA
Other trademarks owned by HANOVER ARCHITECTURAL PRODUCTS, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph R. Falcon
Joseph R. Falcon Attorney of Record, Pennsylvania Bar Member2 Great Valley ParkwaySte. 110Malvern, PA 19355Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | formed concrete paving blocks for use in paving surfaces to assist the visually-impaired | ACTIVE | Jun 6, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hanover Architectural Products Business Trust
- Other trademarks owned by Hanover Architectural Products Business Trust
- Other trademarks owned by HANOVER ARCHITECTURAL PRODUCTS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named DETECTABLE WARNING
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2025 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | โ |
| Nov 15, 2025 | RNL3 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (THIRD RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 15, 2025 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 15, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | โ |
| Jul 31, 2025 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | โ |
| Dec 15, 2015 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - MAILED | โ |
| Dec 15, 2015 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 15, 2015 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 14, 2015 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | โ |
| Oct 9, 2015 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | โ |
| Oct 5, 2015 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | โ |
| Oct 5, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | โ |
| Mar 11, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | โ |
| Jan 17, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | โ |
| Jan 10, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | โ |
| Jun 8, 2005 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 8, 2005 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 27, 2005 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | โ |
| Apr 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | โ | |
| Aug 3, 2001 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 12, 2001 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | โ |
| Oct 3, 1995 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 1, 1995 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | โ |
| Jun 19, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| May 3, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |
| Oct 24, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |