Drawing for DISCOVERY

USPTO serial 74530717

DISCOVERY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLEAVER-BASCOMBE, KARE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DISCOVERY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew H. Simpson

ANDREW H SIMPSON KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST 14TH FLIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012baby bicycle seats and parts thereof, namely seat pads, safety belts and their fastenings, and footrests; and luggage cases and bags for bicyclesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 31, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 18, 1997ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 18, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 18, 1997EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 26, 1997DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 4, 1996CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Sep 16, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 12, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 28, 1996DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 12, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 23, 1996EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 7, 1995CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 1, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 28, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 26, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance