USPTO serial 74531121
VICTORY GARDEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUPP, TERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VICTORY GARDEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
East Hampton, NY
East Hampton, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Apolzon
LAWRENCE E APOLZON FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | bath and personal care products, namely after bath body moisturizing lotion, after bath perfumed dew, after bath firming moisturizer, after bath scented powder, bath body scrub, bath body gel exfoliant, bath body shampoo, botanical bath soap bar, botanical bath soap liquid, botanical bath foaming gel, botanical bath foaming beads, botanical bath salts, botanical bath oil, liquid bubble bath containing botanicals, bubbling bath crystals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 21, 1998 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 1998 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 1998 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 1998 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 1997 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 8, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 8, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 26, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 21, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |