Drawing for CAMPO D'ORO

USPTO serial 74531903

CAMPO D'ORO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRONT, MITCHELL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CAMPO D'ORO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JAMES A POULOS III

JAMES A POULOS III NIKAIDO MARMELSTEIN MURRAY & ORAM LLP655 15TH ST NW STE 330 G ST LOBBYWASHINGTON, DC 20005-5701UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029meat, fish, poultry and game; meat extracts; preserved, dred and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams; eggs, milk, cheese, yogurt and sour cream; edible oils and fats; salad dressings; preservesACTIVE—
030coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; flour and processed cereals; bread, pastry and candy, flavored ices; honey, treacle; yeast, baking-powder; salt; mustard; vinegar, sauces, salad dressings; spices; ice, ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; and malt for food purposes and malt extracts used as flavoringsACTIVE—
031living plants, unprocessed grains for eating and/or agricultural grains for planting; living animals; fresh fruits and vegetables; seeds, natural plants and flowers; foodstuffs for animals, malt for brewing and distillingACTIVE—
032beers; mineral and aerated waters soft drinks, and/or non-alcoholic malt beverages; fruit drinks and fruit juices; syrups and malt liquorACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 13, 1999ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 28, 1999CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 18, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 19, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 15, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 30, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 23, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 6, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 10, 1996CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 21, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 20, 1996CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 16, 1996CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 21, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 23, 1995CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 14, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 30, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance