Drawing for ITALIAN FOOD ACADEMY SAN FRANCISCO

USPTO serial 74531904

ITALIAN FOOD ACADEMY SAN FRANCISCO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRONT, MITCHELL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ITALIAN FOOD ACADEMY SAN FRANCISCO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James A. Poulos III

JAMES A POULOS III STEVENS, DAVIS, MILLER & MOSHER515 N WASHINGTON STP O BOX 1427ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029meat, fish, poultry and game; meat extracts; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams; eggs, milk, cheese, yogurt and sour cream, edible oils and fats; salad dressings; preservesABANDONED—
030coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; flour and processed cereals, bread, pastry and candy, flavored ices; honey, treacle; yeast, baking-powder; salt; mustard; vinegar, sauces salad dressings; spices; ice, ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; and malt for food purposes and malt extracts used as flavoringsABANDONED—
031living plants, unprocessed dgrains for eating and/or agricultural grains for planting; living animals; fresh fruits and vegetables; seeds, natural plants and flowers; foodstuffs for animals, malt for brewing and distillingABANDONED—
032beers; mineral and aerated waters soft drinks, and/or non-alcoholic malt beverages; fruit drinks and fruit juices; syrups and malt liquorABANDONED—
033wines, sparkling wines, champagne and liquorsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 28, 1999ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 12, 1998CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 16, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 19, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 10, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 30, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 30, 1996CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 28, 1996CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 6, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 6, 1995CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 5, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 28, 1995CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 30, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 30, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 30, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance