USPTO serial 74532347
LITTLE HAVANA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LITTLE HAVANA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Margaret Ferguson
WILLIAM R GOLDEN JR KELLEY, DRYE & WARREN101 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10178UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | rum, distilled spirits specialty containing rum and prepared alcoholic cocktail containing rum | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 20, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 1, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 17, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 22, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 14, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 7, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 15, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 21, 1997 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 1, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 1, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 8, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 8, 1997 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 3, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 1997 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Apr 23, 1997 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 20, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 16, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 15, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 1996 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 15, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 9, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |