USPTO serial 74532725
AROMAFORCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, CRAIG
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AROMAFORCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
St. Laurent, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SUSAN L. COHEN
SUSAN L COHEN50 E 42ND ST19TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cosmetics, including creams, lotions and gel suntan lotions; astringent and skin care products, namely creams, lotions, hair and body shampoos and conditioners, perfumes; lip balm, foot powder and cream, bath salts; shaving preparations, namely aftershave lotions, shaving foams, colognes; cosmetic preparations, namely beauty masks, cold creams, eye makeup remover, facial scrubs; dentifrices; depilatory creams; body oils, skin lotion, hand cream, talcum powder, personal deodorants, anti-perspirants, bath foams, bath oil, bath powder, body cream, body oil, body gel, body powder, skin cleansing lotion, night cream, bubble bath, body wash; preparations for the hair, namely hair pomade, hair conditions, hair gel, hair dressing for man, hair rinse, hair spray, deodorant soap, skin soap, hand soap, perfumed soap, face soap; essential oils for personal use and for use in the manufacture of cosmetics | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 22, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 1995 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Apr 20, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |