USPTO serial 74532784
TAMARA DE LEMPICKA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ERVIN, INGA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TAMARA DE LEMPICKA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SUE Z. SHAPER
SUE Z SHAPER SUE Z SHAPER, PC2925 BRIARPARK DR STE 930HOUSTON, TX 77042UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | perfumery, namely perfume, toilet water, eau de cologne; cosmetics, namely blusher, eye makeup, eye makeup remover, eye shadow, eyebrow pencil, eye cream, beauty mask, cold cream, eyeliner, lip gloss, lipsticks, makeup foundation, mascara, face rouge, skin clarifier, skin cleansing cream and lotion, skin emollient, skin lightener, skin moisturizer, skin toner, face powder and enamel for manicure | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | electric and scientific apparatus, namely sunglasses and frames for eyeglasses | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | clothing, namely shirts, caps, hats, raincoats, parkas, waistcoats, jackets, coats, bathing suits, blouses, belts, shawls, tabards, socks, tights, scarves, handkerchiefs, gloves, shirts, skirts, jumpers, overblouses, windbreakers, trousers, pants, dresses, under garments, tee-shirts, suits, shorts, bermuda shorts, tunics and culottes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 1995 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |