USPTO serial 74532926
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
W. Warren Taltavull
W WARREN TALTAVULL CUSHMAN, DARBY & CUSHMAN1100 NEW YORK AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | metal containers for the storage and transportation of goods; metal impregnation vessels for soaking wood chips prior to treatment in paper pulp digesting machines | ABANDONED | — |
| 007 | electric machine motors; paper pulping machines and filters and filter presses for use therein; filtering machines for use in paper making; pulp cleaning machines for use in paper making; paper pulp washing machines, pulp bleaching machines, mechanical mixing machines; pulp screening machines and pumps for use with the aforementioned machines; paper pulp digesting machines and conveyors for feeding raw material therein | ABANDONED | — |
| 011 | paper pulp scrubbing units, electric heaters for use in paper making, industrial filtering units for cleaning oils, liquids and gases | ABANDONED | — |
| 021 | non-metal impregnation vessels for soaking wood ships prior to treatment in paper pulp digesting machines | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 23, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |