USPTO serial 74533069
LABTAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEIFMAN, ARI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LABTAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Braeside, Victoria 3195, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
B. Parker Livingston, Jr.
B PARKER LIVINGSTON JR POPHAM HAIK SCHNOBRICH & KAUFMAN655 15TH ST N WSTE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20005-5701Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware; computer software for embedded systems, display devices, networking, data and image manipulation and storage, communications and conferencing, computer work stations comprising a keyboard, pointer, video display and logic module; computer terminals, namely X-terminals; computer components, namely computer peripherals; printed circuit boards; communication peripherals, namely multiplexers, bandwidth management devices, modems, terminal adapters, network access devices, and video and audio conferencing devices; ISDN devices, namely customer terminal equipment; gateways; routers | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 27, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 4, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |