Drawing for IQ CAM

USPTO serial 74533519

IQ CAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 608
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GLEMBOCKI, ERICA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IQ CAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John P. Bouxsein, III

JOHN P BOUXSEIN III28 W 014 WARRENVILLE RDP O BOX 467WARRENVILLE, IL 60555

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009lighting and visual diagnostic and image analysis systems comprising cameras, digital image processors, computer hardware, computer software, computer peripherals, monitors and printers all for recordal, measurement, interpretation and analysis of complex imagesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 10, 1998PR.DPETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED—
May 23, 1997PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 1996ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 31, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 23, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 1, 1995CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 24, 1995CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 10, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 4, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance