USPTO serial 74533633
BREADSMITH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BREADSMITH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JEFFREY M. SAMUELS
JEFFREY M SAMUELS LAW OFFICE OF JEFFREY M SAMUELS, PC4122 LEONARD DRFAIRFAX, VA 22030UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 1996 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 2, 1996 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 3, 1996 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 4, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 17, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 2, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |