Drawing for SERVO MAX II

USPTO serial 74534441

SERVO MAX II

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1913109Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 22, 1995
Examiner
TINGLEY, JOHN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SERVO MAX II?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elliot A. Salter

ELLIOT A SALTER SALTER & MICHAELSON321 S MAIN STPROVIDENCE, RI 02903UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009vector controlled alternating current servo controllerSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDNov 23, 1993

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 1997C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Nov 6, 1997CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Nov 6, 1997CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
May 27, 1997C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Feb 27, 1996PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 22, 1995R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 25, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 24, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 23, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 7, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 11, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance