USPTO serial 74535939
INSTANT OIL CHANGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BILLINGS, JESSIE W
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INSTANT OIL CHANGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bridget A. Griffin
ROBERT D LITOWITZ FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOWGARRETT & DUNNER1300 I ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | vehicle preventative maintenance services, namely lubricating chassis; changing motor oil; changing oil and air filters; refilling transmission, differential, brake, power steering, radiator, windshield washer and battery reservoirs to proper fluid levels; changing windshield wiper blades; and, inflating tires to proper pressure | ABANDONED | Mar 13, 1982 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 1999 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 3, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 3, 1999 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 27, 1997 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 27, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 26, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 19, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 13, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 1995 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 8, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 13, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 24, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |