USPTO serial 74536034
VIDEO DNA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2246283Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 18, 1999
- Examiner
- KARGER, WILLIAM
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VIDEO DNA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Visual Automation Systems, Inc.
LITTLETON, CO
Visual Automation Systems, Inc.
Los Angeles, CA
New Port Richey, FL
Visual Automation Systems, Inc.
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES R. SIMS III
Kim LeGate LEGATE, KIM3737 Topsail TrlNEW PORT RICHEY, FL 34652UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware and software for use in connection with the processing, recording, reproduction, transmission, distribution, control, reception, playback, signalling, encoding, decoding, identification, editing, modifying, cueing, routing, switching, activating and controlling of video signals; and instruction manuals sold therewith | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 16, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Visual Automation Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Visual Automation Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by LEGATE, KIM
- Other trademarks owned by Visual Automation Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named VIDEO DNA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 27, 2009 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 27, 2009 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 17, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 15, 2009 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 5, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| May 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2005 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 17, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2000 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 18, 1999 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 5, 1999 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 21, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 1998 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 24, 1998 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 1998 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 1998 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 1997 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 1997 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 1, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 7, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 6, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 15, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 10, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |