USPTO serial 74537159
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julie B. Albert
Julie B. Albert Baker Botts L.L.P.30 Rockefeller PlazaNew York, NY 10112-4498United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | testing services involving lubricating and fuel oil analysis; consultations in fuel selection and use and fuel-system design; inspection services in the power generation and distribution, oil and gas, petro-chemical, crane and water handling, water distribution and desalinization industries; industrial quality control services requiring design review, technical analysis and inspection to assure quality in design, quality in manufacture and construction, and quality in maintenance for industrial applications involving the building of merchant vessels, stationary power plants, hydro-electric installations, oil refineries, chemical and gas plants, pipelines and refrigeration plants; engineering, consultation, and technical evaluation, analysis, testing and design services relating to industrial quality control services; consulting services in materials and workmanship quality for industry; equipment inspection services to insure compliance with buyer specifications; inspection, testing, and approval for others of cargo containers, boilers and pressure vessels; offshore engineering services; design review and inspection services to assure owners and operators that fixed and floating offshore structures, drilling units, submarine pipeline systems, and their equipment and facilities are fit for intended use and reliable; design analysis and specification services for ships; [ providing marine structural designs for ship owners that plans are feasible and reliable; ] marine services, namely review, analysis inspection, and quality-assurance services to ensure that vessels and marine structures are reliable and fit for intended use; design review, engineering analysis, field inspection, and surveys for vessels of government agencies to assure quality, improve performance, and control expenditures; providing damage condition inspections, grain-loading and storage inspections, towing inspections and repair estimates; troubleshooting analytical services for obtaining solutions to problems related to structures, materials and welding, control systems, plant and component efficiency, machinery, noise and vibration, and shaft alignment using computer-based technology, metrology equipment and analytical procedures; providing quality assurance services for others in the construction, repair, communication, transportation, storage and material treatment for the insurance, financial, advertising and business industries; providing vessel condition analysis services of vessel structure, machinery, and operating equipment, namely analysis of gaugings, structural evaluation on existing vessels to evaluate strength and fatigue and structural performance projections; damage analysis of marine vessels, machinery and operating equipment; condition analysis of vessels' internal spaces including cargo and ballast tanks; dynamic based design and evaluation services for the design and construction of new vessels, namely structural performance projections, strength and fatigue analysis based on dynamic loading approach | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2026 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2026 | RNL3 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (THIRD RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 21, 2026 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 21, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 7, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2016 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 5, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 5, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 10, 2006 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 10, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 1996 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 31, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 2, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 31, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 24, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |