USPTO serial 74537386
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Calgary, Alberta T2A 6T8, CA
Calgary, Alberta T2A 6T8, CA
Calgary, Alberta T2A 6T8, CA
Calgary, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David E. Sipiora
David E. Sipiora Townsend and Townsend and Crew LLPTwo Embarcadero Center, Eighth FloorSan Francisco, CA 94111UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | polystyrene insulating and drainage product in the nature of a molded expanded foam board designed to provide insulation and drainage to relieve hydrostatic pressure on foundations, sold as a unit with foundation drainage system | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2008 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 19, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 30, 2003 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Dec 30, 1997 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 7, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 5, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 1, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 1, 1997 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 6, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 1997 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Apr 17, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 10, 1996 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 1996 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 13, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 10, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 7, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |