Drawing for SERVOMATE

USPTO serial 74537715

SERVOMATE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GREENBAUM, CINDY BETH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SERVOMATE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAURIE A. EBLING

LAURIE A EBLING REISING, ETHINGTON BARNARD & PERRYP O BOX 4390TROY, MI 48900UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007worm gearing and parts thereforABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 12, 2018ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 19, 1996ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Sep 11, 1995ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 28, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 1, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 22, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 25, 1995CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 23, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 17, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance