USPTO serial 74537832
PLATINUM QUATTRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PLATINUM QUATTRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel J. Bourque
DANIEL J BOURQUE, PA835 HANOVER ST STE 303MANCHESTER, NH 03104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | non-portable, stand and floor mounted high performance audio speakers without stereo receiver, cassette player, CD player and associated amplifier, carrying case or handle | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 1997 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 16, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 15, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 19, 1997 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 29, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 10, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 26, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 24, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 16, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |