USPTO serial 74537845
LATITUDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, GLENN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LATITUDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARY KATHRYN LEE
MARY KATHRYN LEE STEINHART & FALCONER LLPSTE 3200333 MARKET STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2150Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | telecommunications and computer hardware and software for use in audio conference systems, voice and call processing systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2004 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Feb 8, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 30, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 11, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 27, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |