USPTO serial 74538102
RENEGADE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLACK, CHERYL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RENEGADE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Timothy A. French
TIMOTHY A FRENCH FISH & RICHARDSON225 FRANKLIN STBOSTON, MA 02110-2804UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | sports equipment, namely balls, namely playground balls, soccer balls and volleyballs; skates, namely roller skates, in-line wheel skates, double runner blade skates, figure skates, hockey skates; and skate parts and accessories, namely skate wheels and bearings, heel brakes and stops, straps, training wheels and laces | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 1996 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 7, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 7, 1996 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 30, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 30, 1996 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 13, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 16, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 17, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 24, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 22, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 7, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 31, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |