USPTO serial 74538329
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Wolf
DAVID WOLF WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, PC600 ATLANTIC AVEBOSTON, MA 02210-2211UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | professional electric espresso-making machines for hotel and restaurant commercial use | ABANDONED | Feb 14, 1994 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 27, 1997 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 6, 1996 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 6, 1996 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 18, 1996 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 21, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 8, 1996 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 30, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 22, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 10, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |