USPTO serial 74538676
WE CARE FOR BEAUTY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARKE, NANCY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WE CARE FOR BEAUTY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rod S. Berman
ROD S BERMAN TRADEMARK DEPTLOEB & LOEB LLP1000 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 1800LOS ANGELES, CA 90017-2475Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | perfumery products, namely perfumes and toilet water; beauty products, namely rouge, eye shadow, base make-up, face and beauty masks, lipsticks, nail polishes, and removers, creams and other make-up removers; toilet and bath products, namely shampoos, bath salts, bath and shower gels, bubble baths, toilet soaps; essential oils for personal use; hair lotions; shaving soaps, creams and foams, after-shave lotions and balms, toothpastes; tanning products, namely milks, lotions and creams; self-tanning creams, skin tanning lotions; non-medical preparations for skin and face care, namely non-medical vitalizing and toning lotions and creams, moisturizing lotions and creams, granulated creams and deodorants for personal use, skin lotions, sun tanning oils, and cleaning products, namely preparations for cleansing the skin | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 11, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 1995 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 1995 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 1, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |