USPTO serial 74539387
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John L. Welch
JOHN L WELCH DIKE, BRONSTEIN ROBERTS & CUSHMAN130 WATER STBOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | restaurant and nightclub services | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 1996 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 15, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 24, 1996 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 19, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 31, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 31, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 23, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 9, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |