USPTO serial 74539659
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Naperville, IL
Naperville, IL
Naperville, IL
Naperville, IL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KATHLEEN A. RHEINTGEN
KATHLEEN A RHEINTGEN WELSH & KATZ, LTD135 S LASALLE STSTE 1625CHICAGO, IL 60603| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | equipment sold as a unit for playing a casino game | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 1996 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 17, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 17, 1996 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 12, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 31, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 26, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 13, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |