USPTO serial 74539898
DANGER RANGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DANGER RANGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Princeton, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jasper C. Rowe
JASPER C ROWE LAW OFFICE OF JASPER C ROWE2605 CIELO DRPLANO, TX 75074UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | devices employing audio and video methods for signalling, for use by caretaker individuals and their charges to alert the caretakers of danger to individuals within their custody; computer software, hardware and audio and video disks and tapes for use in informing caretakers of danger to, and methods of protecting against danger to individuals within their custody | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 1996 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jun 13, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 16, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |