USPTO serial 74541686
CERAMEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLE RICHARD G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CERAMEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Fernanda M. Fiordalisi
FERNANDA M FIORDALISI BUCKNAM AND ARCHER600 OLD COUNTRY RDGARDEN CITY LONG ISLAND, NY 11530UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | capillary filter machines used for dewatering of slurries in the processing and mining industries and in coal technology | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 1998 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 27, 1998 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 27, 1998 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 25, 1997 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 1997 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 29, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 19, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 8, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |