USPTO serial 74542076
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
PACIFIC MM PTY. LIMITED (A.C.N. 007619767)
MCMAHONS POINT, AU
Other trademarks owned by PACIFIC MM PTY. LIMITED (A.C.N. 007619767)
Murdoch Magazines Pty Limited (ACN 007 619 767)
New South Wales 2060, AU
Other trademarks owned by Murdoch Magazines Pty Limited (ACN 007 619 767)
Murdoch Magazines Pty Limited (ACN 007 619 767)
New South Wales 2060, AU
Other trademarks owned by Murdoch Magazines Pty Limited (ACN 007 619 767)
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barry I. Hollander
Barry I. Hollander Greenblum & Bernstein, P.L.C.1950 Roland Clarke PlaceReston, VA 20191-1411UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | printed manner, namely reference books, guest books, birthday books, address books, diaries, magazines, leaflets, brochures and books featuring children's books and magazines, cooking books and magazines, home project books and magazines, gardening books and magazines, knitting books and magazines, crochet books and magazines, cocktails and party drinks books and magazines, microwave cook books and magazines, craft books and magazines, do-it-yourself books and magazines, medical books and magazines, wedding books and magazines, and catalogues of said books and magazines, not including magazines regarding magazines and books | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2011 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 12, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 13, 2000 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 30, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 1999 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 1999 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 1998 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 1998 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 2, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 31, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 7, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 21, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 21, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 22, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 1996 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 29, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |