USPTO serial 74542248
MMC-TV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MMC-TV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary L. Shaffer
CYNTHIA K NICHOLSON FOLEY & LARDNERSTE 5003000 K ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20007-5109Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | broadcasting of television and cable television programs featuring health-related issues, namely, interactive telecommunications enabling real time interaction between service providers and customers | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | production and programming of television and cable television programs featuring health-related issues, namely, interactive telecommunications enabling real time interaction between service providers and customers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MicroMass Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MicroMass Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named MMC-TV
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 19, 2000 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 1999 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 28, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 25, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 3, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 3, 1997 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 11, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 5, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 7, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 27, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 24, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |