USPTO serial 74542518
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software used in retrieving, viewing and printing staff information, schedules and reports | ABANDONED | Mar 18, 1994 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 1997 | PR.D | PETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED | — |
| Jul 8, 1997 | PRIM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 1996 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 1, 1995 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 25, 1995 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 26, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |