USPTO serial 74543636
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
KONICA PHOTO SERVICE U.S.A., INC.
East Hartford, CT
KONICA PHOTO SERVICE U.S.A., INC.
East Hartford, CT
KONICA PHOTO SERVICE U.S.A., INC.
East Hartford, CT
PHOENIX INTANGIBLES HOLDING COMPANY
GREENVILLE, DE
Other trademarks owned by PHOENIX INTANGIBLES HOLDING COMPANY
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David V. Radack
David V. Radack Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC600 Grant Street, 44th FloorPittsburgh, PA 15219UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | photographic printing and developing services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 1997 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 9, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 11, 2008 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 8, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 1997 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 16, 1997 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 11, 1997 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 17, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 1997 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 31, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 27, 1996 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 26, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 23, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 1, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 17, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 17, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |