Drawing for KINDER PINGUI

USPTO serial 74544900

KINDER PINGUI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELLO, ZACK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KINDER PINGUI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RAYMOND A. KURX

RAYMOND A KURZ HOGAN & HARTSON LLP555 13TH ST NW STE 701ECOLUMBIA SQWASHINGTON, DC 20004-1109

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030cold pastry product with a filling comprising milk, cocoa and/or other ingredients enrobed with chocolate or chocolate-flavoredACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 24, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 24, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 31, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 5, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 12, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 12, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 7, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 23, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 23, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 29, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 17, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 17, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 25, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 17, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 14, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 14, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 15, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 31, 2003OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 31, 2003OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jul 29, 1996OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 29, 1995ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 2, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 29, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 23, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 23, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 3, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance