USPTO serial 74545174
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patrick P. Phillips
PATRICK P PHILLIPS BIEBEL & FRENCH2500 KETTERING TWRDAYTON, OH 45423UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | educational services, namely, creating and conducting seminars, conducting training sessions for such seminars, and organizing and facilitating opportunities for ministry | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 1996 | PR.D | PETITION TO REVIVE DISMISSED | — |
| Jan 29, 1996 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 10, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |