Drawing for CDT CABLE DESIGN TECHNOLOGIES

USPTO serial 74545232

CDT CABLE DESIGN TECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1950332Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 23, 1996
Examiner
STINE, DAVID
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with CDT CABLE DESIGN TECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David Wolf

DAVID WOLF WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, PC600 ATLANTIC AVEBOSTON, MA 02210-2211UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009electrical, telecommunications and data transmission wire and cable, namely fiber optic and copper wire cables, audio and video cables, multiconductor multipair coaxial cable, twin axial cable, screened and shielded, solid and stranded hook-up wire, multicore control cables, flat ribbon cables, instrument and computer cables, data transmission cables, high-temperature cables, cables for use in sound communications, local area networks, instrumentation, telecommunications, audio communicationsSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 4, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 28, 2006CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Sep 26, 2006CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 3, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 8, 2002C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Dec 31, 2001815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jan 23, 1996R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 31, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 2, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 22, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 2, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 31, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 17, 1995NAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED—
Feb 21, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 16, 1995CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 12, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 16, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance