USPTO serial 74545364
MATCHED PERFORMANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYES, GINA CLARK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MATCHED PERFORMANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew T. Hoyne
ANDREW T HOYNE PEPER, MARTIN, JENSEN, MAICHEL, ET AL720 OLIVE ST 24TH FLST LOUIS, MO 63101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electric motor controls and controllers including electronic controllers for starting and braking electric motors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 1998 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 18, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 1998 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 1998 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 20, 1998 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 18, 1998 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 28, 1997 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 28, 1997 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 20, 1997 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 15, 1997 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 1997 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 7, 1997 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 1996 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 9, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 29, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 27, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 26, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 11, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 6, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |