USPTO serial 74547211
MCM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICH, NORMAN J.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MCM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ralph M. Burton
RALPH H BURTON BROOKS & KUSHMAN PC1000 TOWN CTRTWENTY-SECOND FLSOUTHFIELD, MI 48075Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MCM MODERNE CREATION MUNCHEN REISEGEPACK GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by MCM MODERNE CREATION MUNCHEN REISEGEPACK GMBH
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MCM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 1998 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 9, 1998 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 9, 1998 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 24, 1997 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 23, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 24, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 22, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 17, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 11, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 1996 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 10, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 2, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |