USPTO serial 74547906
SPA BOTANIKA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPA BOTANIKA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lynne E. Graybeal
LYNNE E GRAYBEAL FOSTER PEPPER & SHEFELMAN1111 THIRD AVE STE 3400SEATTLE, WA 98101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | toiletries and personal care preparations, namely skin cleansers, toners, moisture fluids, tonics, skin care masks, body washes, skin care exfoliators, moisturizers, spray-on dry body oils, body oils, mineral soaks, shampoos, hair care muds, massage oil, soaps, and potpourri | ABANDONED | Nov 19, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 1996 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 26, 1996 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 27, 1996 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 7, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 23, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 11, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |