USPTO serial 74549453
RAGIN CAJUN CAFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE INFORMATION UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RAGIN CAJUN CAFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hermosa Beach, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donna A. Rubelmann
DONNA A RUBELMANN501 HERONDO ST STE 45HERMOSA BEACH, CA 90245UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | restaurant services | ABANDONED | Apr 7, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 1997 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 9, 1997 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 6, 1997 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 22, 1996 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 6, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 23, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 5, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |