USPTO serial 74550112
CARE+
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SARAI, BALDEV
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CARE+?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
KANSEI HEALTHCARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 1B6, CA
Other trademarks owned by KANSEI HEALTHCARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
KANSEI HEALTHCARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 1B6, CA
Other trademarks owned by KANSEI HEALTHCARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael C. Greenbaum
MICHAEL C GREENBAUM WIGMAN, COHEN, LEITNER & MYERTHE FARRAGUT BLDG STE 1000, 10TH FL900 - 17TH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for automated records administration and management in hospitals and healthcare facilities and user manuals therefor | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | consulting services in the area of automated records administration and management in hospitals and health care facilities; said services performed in such facilities in the areas of health records, medical dictation, medical abstracting, admissions, discharges and transfers, scheduling, operating room booking, recordable incidents and errors, emergency registration, and outpatient registration | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KANSEI HEALTHCARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by KANSEI HEALTHCARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named CARE+
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 16, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 24, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 3, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 10, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 19, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 26, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |