USPTO serial 74550562
GRAPEVINE SOFTWARE CORPORATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHAW, THOMAS V
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GRAPEVINE SOFTWARE CORPORATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christine S. Lam
RONALD S LAURIE SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP525 UNIVERSITY AVESTE 220PALO ALTO, CA 94301Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer programs for - inventory planning and control and for development of corporate sales and marketing presentation materials and instructional manuals sold therewith | ACTIVE | Feb 27, 1994 |
| 042 | consultation and computer programming services related to inventory planning and control, and in development of corporate sales and marketing presentation materials | ACTIVE | Feb 27, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Grapevine Software Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Grapevine Software Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named GRAPEVINE SOFTWARE CORPORATION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2001 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 24, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 22, 1996 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 23, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 21, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 16, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 3, 1996 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 3, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 3, 1996 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 13, 1995 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 2, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 27, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |