USPTO serial 74550639
LANPHONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LANPHONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BARBARA L. FRIEDMAN
STACEY REINECCIUS520 TOWNSEND STSTE 3SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | system for computer-telephone integration, or telephony, for the transfer of real-time data, such as voice, video or multimedia, across Ethernet lines simultaneously with the transmission of nonreal-time data, such system, comprising software with computer telephone integration functions and instructional manuals sold as a unit, and computer hardware and peripherals allowing voice, video and data interconnection via a local area network, including telephones, telephone handsets, telephone systems which permit interactive voice response, namely, voice mail processors, automatic call distributors, Pbx's and key telephones, telephone enabled computer networking hubs, telephone enabled node devices, namely, PC cards with telephone capabilities, processing cards and integrated cameras with alarm functions and LAN-based telephone connections, telephone enhancements, namely, PC cards, computer telephone accelerators and headsets, node interface cards, interface cards, access devices to retrieve telephone data from a local area network, software control packages for monitoring traffic and calls made on a local area network and for monitoring the quality of the network, and software diagnostic packages for monitoring usage patterns and identifying problems with a local area network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 26, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 29, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 24, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 29, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2000 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 27, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 27, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 20, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 6, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 4, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 5, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 3, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |